| >Home
>Features >Guiding change
Moving
from one state to another involves a transitional state –
steam becomes water before it becomes ice.
The
same is true in organisations, where it is difficult to move
from now to the future in one leap. The bigger the change, the
more difficult to bridge the gap in one go and the more energy
required.
Change
decays over time and those leading change feel they have failed.
A
different way to create change is to guide, rather than manage
the process. Central to guiding is to create transitional entities
(teams, roles, processes).
This
temporary set-up allows people to review the journey and check
the plans will be effective.
The
approach has a number of benefits:
- Allows
for assessment of risks, benefits and impacts
- Creates
clear, modifiable transition plans
-
Ensures small but vital changes are made during the transition
- Creates
a more change capable organisation – one that will cope
increasingly well with each successive wave of change.
The
change process
Creating an internal change team facilitates change early. Where
the change will be felt across the organisation, the change
team helps to create an organisation-wide appreciation of the
planned changes and their effects – before things start
to happen.
Stakeholder
walkthroughs give an opportunity to imagine the future and give
initial reactions.
Everyone
knows effective communication is critical to success during
change and yet it is often left till the last (panic) moment.
Those
affected need to know what to expect and strong sponsorship
from the change visionary is essential. This does not have to
be the CEO but it must be someone who can imagine living in
this future – and be able to describe that place to others.
Change
can have a long lead-time before it is truly assimilated and
sponsors may come and go.
When
sponsors move on, acknowledge it quickly and ensure full transfer
of the sponsor’s commitment – or re-evaluate the
new situation. Just letting the change drag and die is not good
for anyone’s morale.
Getting started
Begin a change assignment with a group event consisting of senior
managers, the change team, and any other change drivers.
This
group articulates the reasons for change and what will be required.
These sessions can become rather problem focused so ask what
is going well too.
This
helps the key influencers to enhance, and more deeply embed,
the rudiments of tomorrow’s successful ways of working
into today’s routine practices.
The
workshop delivers:
- Change
case – why must we do this?
-
Change vision – what will it look like
tomorrow?
-
Change strategy – how will we do things
differently?
-
Change process – how will we move between
now and the future?
-
Change programme – what are the key
milestones on our journey?
Common
barriers to action
- Lack
of organisation experience in the process of change
-
Low energy and apathy
-
Complacency - ‘Why change? We are good already!’
-
Stop-start change process
-
Change sponsor gets cold feet when the going gets tough
-
Grapevine ignored, not monitoring the word on the streets
-
Insufficient resources - Change Team spread too thin
- Unclear
focus for the change.
Guide the change
The
difficult step is getting things moving. Mobilisation requires
energy from the change sponsor, energy that the change team
must magnify and feed into the organisation.
The
change team is pivotal in energising the organisation, the change
sponsor and each other. Only with a constant source of energy
will the change actually happen.
A
transitional change team rides the waves of transformation better
than permanent structures.
This
team can set plans in motion and review what actually happens
through their relationships with the organisation and allows
them to guide the way change unfolds – rather than being
held to deliver static plans that have become obsolete.
A
beneficial approach
The traditional approach to change drives it from the top and
the change is done to lower levels. It generally excludes those
most affected until things have started to move.
Change
is seen as controllable and therefore planning is done in detail
for some months ahead.
Seeing
change as unpredictable creates a different attitude that encourages
temporary change tactics.
This
approach engages more of the organisation, earlier, and calls
for feedback as an essential part of sensing and staying on
track. It recognises that detailed planning is best restricted
to the short term on a rolling basis.
Vital
to sustainability, this approach allows change to build on what
works best for the organisation.
The
use of temporary teams to bridge the transition phase increases
the chance of successful change – not just in the moment,
but for tomorrow’s business.
June
2006
|